Pageviews past week

The cold world of skimo & alpine climbing

The cold world of skimo & alpine climbing

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

True Love!.... Scarpa 6000 mods

Two of the best names in the business make a great pair of boots ;)

I written about so many boots here that I have lost count. 

I had so many different pairs of boots over the last 10 years I've lost count.

I've always known I had feet that were difficult to fit.  Have since middle school and earlier.  Literally as long as I can remember.  Long and narrow feet with a really narrow heel.  I've seen skinnier feet just not many.  Poor bastards, even skinnier feet have REAL problems fitting rock shoes and mountain boots. 

I've also know a couple of guys that might as well have a pair of duck's feet.  Super wide forefeet  so they have to buy shoes a couple of sizes too long just to accommodate the width of their feet.  Now there is a problem I really, really wouldn't want.  Nothing helpful for the end user there.

As my feet have aged they have needed a wider last.  Bunions from years in too tight of rock shoes and too tight of ski boots.  The small bunions on my little toe and even worse on my big toe have slowly developed and grown larger almost every year.  So no more super tight rock shoes or ski boots but nothing a bit of boot stretching or a wider boot hasn't helped so far.

In the past I have really liked/enjoyed a very few pairs of boots.  The first a pair of leather and wood, hand pegged Haderer single boots.  Those I picked up 2nd hand.  Loved those boots and climbed hard in the mountains with them.  They required a Super Gaiter to keep my feet warm enough though.   The Haderers were pretty much an over built Galibier Super Guide as a reference.  But oh my, did those boots ever fit my feet well.  A rigid sole and plenty of support.  Perfect!

Next up was my first and only pair of plastics.  the Kolflach Ultras.  Size 12.  Those are still sitting in my gear room, literally rotting away.  But I'll likely never get rid of them.  First climbing boot I had to use moleskin with on a regular basis.  That was only just OK for fit, but they were always warm and climbed exceptionally well.   After that it has been a blur going down hill.  The first Batura stands out.  The Phantom Guide did not.  May be I should have given the Phantom Guide a better opportunity to impress me.  The Spantik is a great boot.  Once I found a pair that wouldn't break.  The Baruntse is good.  But both have obvious flaws.

So what do I really like?  The Phantom Ultra is still in my life.  Hard to replace though here in North America.  Huge bummer.  Sadly the newest amazing boot BTW....just doesn't fit my feet well.  No one more depressed about that than me.  Because it could have been "THE" boot for me.   The newest  Rebel Ultra is certainly enticing.  I'll be writing about it shortly.  Really stoked about that!  I am hoping the R.U. will ease some of the use on my Phantom Ultras and give them an extended life.  Hope so as the Phantom Ultra  seems to be discontinued.  That was a mistake IMO if that is true.  Either way I have high hopes from using the Rebel Ultra this spring on ice and this summer in the alpine.

Boots are like a few other important things in life.  "You can never be too rich, too strong or too light."

I think boots should have a similar label.  A winter boot can never be too warm, too light or too comfortable as long as it climbs ice well.

Common complaint I hear on the 6000?  ......this time by "Mike":
"Does anyone have any idea how significant the ankle support gain would be with using a Baruntse inner boot in a Scarpa Phantom 6000? I bought the Phantom 6000 in spring and used in in Alaska this year on a lot of endurance ice ( Mt. Huntington West ). They where super warm, light and perfect in steep ice and mixed. They turned out to be complete calf killers in the 50 – 70 degrees blue hard ice part."

That stand out comment from end users on the Phantom 6000, again is, " lack of support on endurance ice".   That was something I could still work with though.  Unpleasant at times but workable.  My biggest complaint was the factory inner boot.  The factory 6000 inner boot offered me a poor fit.  More imprtantly it is really hard to get in and out of with any socks I was using because of the friction between the sock and the lack of inner linner on the foam boot. (Really?  What is Scarpa thinking there? Rookie design error imo )

That problem was not easy to solve but easy enough to have a place to start.  I tried stuffing my La Sportiva Baruntse inner boots in the 6000 shell. (the liners are made by Palau in France)  The first pair were just a hair too big to fit the 6000 shell well.  It took Mike's most recent comment and a full year of waiting to finally buy a second pair of inner boots and molding them to fit the 6000.  If only I had done it earlier!  The Denali Intuition liner stiffened up the Spantik in a similar manner.  So I thought it worth looking at a better inner boot again in the 6000.  Mind you I have climbed a lot in the Baruntse and the Spantik and I really like both boots.  But was always disappointed that La Sportiva wouldn't take advantage of the technology they had on the table, when they could so easily improve either boot.  Again, someone is dropping the ball here imo.

Their loss, my gain.  Eventually.  Eventually, because I kept playing with my Spantiks, Baruntses and the 6000 trying to get the lightest and best fitting double I could come up with...that still climbed as well as I wanted.  Did I mention the 6000 is the easiest boot mentioned here to lace?  It is.  By a big margin if you have to strap them down as tight as I do.  Extremely easy in and out with the ability to adjust the lacing as required.   The best of the bunch here for ease of lacing with the Baruntse liner installed.

Fit was even easier.   The Baruntse liner is heat formable and lots of foam there to work with.  Hard not to get a perfect fit if you know what you are doing.  Light weight?  Nothing as light, as warm or as comfortable that I know of when using the Baruntse liner and the 6000 shell.  Nothing comes even remotely close to how well that combo actually climbs.  May be the factory Baruntse.  But again so many other things are lacking on the Baruntse when you make that comparison.

Size 45 with a proper insole @ 2# 9oz or 1160g

What was left was "endurance ice".  Funny, my 2nd, smaller and better fitting inner boot added enough support to the 6000 shell that those worries are gone.  Totally gone!  Makes the 6000 a front pointing machine,  with a loss of some ankle flexibility side to side.  That loss I can easily live with after gaining the extra support front to back.  Some one besides myself ought to be paying attention here!!!

Seriously this is the first boot I have fallen hard for since my 2nd hand Haderers in the '70s.  But the 6000 with a Baruntse inner boot properly fit is much lighter, much warmer and much more comfortable.  And *CRIKEY* the Phantom 6000 climbs ice well!  Any ice!

Half the equation on ice is the crampon.  I noticed the Cyborg/Spantik combo Dave was using last trip had some flex in the crampon while he was climbing.  Not uncommon with that set up from what I have seen.  Part of the reason is the Spantik's heel/midsole is too soft imo and collapses when the crampon lever is tightened.  At least the Baruntse  midsole avoided that issue.  Part of it is the design flaw in the Cyborg's connecting bar set up.   None of that nonsense (bulllllllshiit) on the 6000 midsole or the Petzl crampons.

The obvious crampon flex is not good!  Boot is a 46.

Worth noting the dismal crampon sole coverage on that boot/crampon combo as well.
It is a sick joke but needs to be pointed out, again.  

I have been using the Dartwin and Dart on my 6000 and the Phantom Ultra.  Both boots use the same heel/toe inserts and midsole.  That combo of boot and crampon fits extremely well and tightens easily with the addition of a BD heel levers.  Same crampons are good on the Ultra (or Phantom Guide) but the Ultra is a fairly soft flexing boot.  On the 6000 the combo climbs more like a rigid plastic boot and a heavy rigid crampon.   The "rigid" combo for ice is really had to beat even 30 years after it was first introduced. Tough part is getting back to the 30+ year old bench mark of  3.5# per boot/crampon combo in my size 45/12.  The 6000/Palau/Dartwin combo is 3.55#.  The bonus?  Gaiter included for that extra 1/2oz.   We are finally ahead of the game, if only barely.

Dbl click the photo an note how flat the crampon is against the boot sole while fully weighted.  The less the crampon flexes on the boot sole the better the combo will climb any kind of ice.  Not every boot or crampon combo will offer this kind of performance.  Add a soft flexing connecting bar to the combo and imagine the performance results.  Have your partner check out your set up and take some pictures of the results next time you are out. 

The nuances I have noted here in crampon and boot fit are important.   I guarantee you more than you might first think.  Just like the previous post on front point length.  Get it all wrong and it is like trying to climb ice in roller skates.  Get it right and you'll think you are a super hero.   "ICE MAN" (or WOman :)

Call this one a PSA.

Palau web site,us,2,11.cfm

La Sportiva web site

Scarpa web site


Dane said...

This from Eric:

Hey Dane.

+1 on the setup you described recently on your blog. After trying on a bunch of boots last year, I settled on the Scarpa 6000's and ordered a pair of the baruntse
liners. I've been super happy with the setup and carefully heat molded them myself. I don't have much to compare them to other than a well used pair of Nepal Evo's, but
I stopped climbing ice in the winter time with the evo's and only climb in the 6000 because they feel lighter, more comfy, warmer and climb ice way better.

I've been climbing on the Lynx crampons and had to flip the linking bars over on
each crampon to reduce the pidgeon toed effect that the frontpoints were doing. Seem to be working but looks kinda weird. This is all with a 47 sized scarpa boot.


Andrej said...

Hey Dane Im planing to buy a pair of the 6000s and the idea of putting baruntse liners is quite neat because of the flimsynes of the originals. So i ve got a qurstion for you how much bigger shoes do i have to buy in order to fit in the baruntse liners. Thanks Andrej

Dane said...

It is nice because you just buy your regular size 6000 and then buy the same size inner boot to match. It is a snug fit so be careful molding the inner boot.

Anonymous said...

Hey Dane, i bought a pair of baruntses and am not feeling them, especially in fit/heel lift, do you know of anywhere in the seattle area to try on 6000?
thanks for all the blogging,

Dane said...

No place I know of in Seattle. May be Whitakers in Ashland but I'd want to call and make sure first. 6000 is not a great fit for some, worse fit than the Baruntse by far in stock form me. You have to mold the liners on the Baruntse for it to actually fit. Although some owners never bother.

7300 miles said...

Dane, have you had a chance to test any of the Salewa boots yet? I think my foot is very similar to yours, long, narrow, low volume. Interested how those will fit, and how the stiff/soft sole switch will work in the real world.

brendan said...

By regular size phantom do you mean the same size as the other phantom sizes? I recall you saying you had to go up a size from your regular size. I've tried and climbed in both the phantom guide and ultra in sz 48, I want to get the phantom 6000s before I go to Alaska this year

Dane said...

I am using a 45 in all my Phantoms now...6000 included.

brendan said...

Cheers for the info Dane, I've ordered some 6000's in my "normal size" for this southern winter season and hope to try out the barunste liners in them

alpine luddite said...


Agree on the old white koflach ultra. I don't think i have ever heard any but you say how good they were. I miss mine. Every plastic boot after them was worthless for both climbing and walking. The Scarpa Vega was ok but that took years to show up.

the 6000 looks great. saw the new model at OR the other month. also impressed with the lowa version, which has a better fit for me.


Unknown said...

Thanks for the review - really helped in making my decision easier! I have a quick question, though. I've been looking into a couple used pairs I've found locally, and some of them are red and a slightly different style. Do you happen to know when this style change occurred, and if there is any actual difference in the boot? I can't seem to find any info on the red vs orange pairs.

Dane said...

New boot a couple of years ago. Old ones are totally different boot.

Sprocket said...

Hi Dane,

I'm checking out the 6000's right now. I really like them, but yeah, that liner is a bummer. The boot shell seems like the right size for me (just about 2 fingers-worth of width between my heel and the boot), but my toe is right at the end of the liner (I know the boots run small, though). Did you have this issue and, if so, did using the Palau liner fix it for you?

Also, which thickness did you get in the Palau liner, 7mm or 8mm.

Thanks Dane!

Dane said...

I'm using the La Sportiva baruntse liner made by Palau..same size as my 6000.

brendan said...

Hi Sprocket. I found that my Scarpa 6000 (sz48) i brought fitted the same as you are describing (toes at the end of the liner, tiny bit small) I am a 48 in both scarpa and la sportiva normally and own ultras and have used guides in size 48. I tried heat moulding my baruntse liner and using these in them but they are still a touch to small. Its a bummer because these are a great boot and I am really happy with my other boots in the phantom series. Im bot sure if its worth me trying to track down a size 49 or if these are going to be too big. I found another guy with the same problem here

Unknown said...

Hi Dane,

Thanks for the super informative posts! I have a question regarding sizing. I tried Phantoms 6k today and the only combination of sizes that I could fit on my foot and inside the shell (without molding) was Phantom size 45 and Baruntse liner 44. That seems to go against your experience. I also heard you mention that the liners can shrink, while at the store I was told that it's easier to expand them during molding. Must say that I'm a bit confused. Did you use new Baruntse liners with your Phantoms or were they molded before already?

Dane said...

Hi Andrez.
I tried the 45 and a 46 liner. All new and then molded them all to a 45 shell. Tried a 46 liner, 46 shell prior. Then found that I could go smaller yet on shell size and not get toe bang. Expensive mistake.

For my feet I found the best fit *after molding* is to use the same size liner and shell.

That said a size 45 6000 shell is a little tight on me with a stock Scarpa liner so I suspect you could use anything close for liner size depending on your specific foot.

Easy to make the foam liners smaller or bigger once heated up. But as you found, you have to be able to get it and your foot in the shell first. Once heated the liner gets bigger in volume but the actual size internally gets smaller.

ChrisK said...


I've been looking at the Spantiks for my first foray into higher altitude terrain (Ecuador), and am now going to check out the 6000s as well. These are more snow climbs than hard ice, but I'm really taken by your crampon photos. I'm wondering how the dartwin would do in "hard snow", compared to a horizontal crampon?


Dane said...

Boots are easy to walk in easier than the Spantik. Horizontals would be better. But Dartwins not bad if the snow is hard. Might want something with a full bot on them how ever. G12? Petzl Vasak maybe even better I think for your trip.

Jimmy said...


Awesome blog - anytime I buy any piece of kit, I check your blog first to see if you have any experience or feedback with it, it's saved me a lot of trouble and money. Sorry to revive such an old thread, but I just wanted to be sure of something before I dropped several hundred dollars on new Phantom 6000's. If I'm going to order the Baruntse inner boot along with a size 45 in the 6000's, what size inner boot would I want to get to insure a good fit? Thanks!

Dane said...

Hi Jimmy, I tried a 46 and several inner boots sizes. Wasn't happy. I finally bought a size 45, 6000 shell and now use a size 45 Baruntse liner. Seems too tight originally. But once molded the inner works perfectly for me and my skinny low volume feet. I typically wear a size 45 or 45.5 in every mtn boot I own from Scarpa, Zamberland and La Sportiva. My street shoe size is a 11.5 My runners are either 11.5 or a 12 US.

Jimmy said...

One more quick question, and apologies if you've already specified in the blog but I didn't see it. Which exact inner boot on the Palau website is the Baruntse inner boot that you used for your 6000's? Thanks!

Dane said...

Jimmy, I,m personally using the La Sportiva Baruntse linner made by Palau. Same size as my shell, 45/45. Nothing from the Palau web site.

Jimmy said...

Thanks for the clarification. I just got the 6000's, and with the stock Scarpa liner (not heat molded) my toes are right up against the end. I can tell it would be painful to climb with this fit...if I'm reading it right though, you had about the same fit before switching to the custom molded Baruntse inner boot? I've never had heat molded double boots before so I'm not sure how the fit compares before and after molding. Will a molded Baruntse inner boot offer more room for toes than the unmolded stock Scarpa inner boot?

Dane said...

They sound too small to me. But I would try on just the shell and see how much room you have. I look for a 3/4" to a full inch behind my heel with my toes just barely touching the front of the boot. If you don't have that kind of room the moldable liner simply will not fit. Standard liner should have plenty of room for your foots as is. If not and everything is tight likely the shell is simply too small or doesn't fit your foot.

Mathew said...

G'day Dane and co

I recently bought some Millet Everest boots for a trip, and noticed they have Alveolite liners. I seem to remember from reading Marc Twight that Alveolite was thermo-mouldable, effectively a precursor to what Intuition are doing. Can anyone confirm or deny this? I wonder if possibly Alveolite itself is, but the materials and construction in any given liner may or may not be appropriate for sticking in the oven...
Any knowledge would be welcome.

Unknown said...

Hi Dane,
Thanks for the reviews as always, they are great. I bought a pair of the Phantom's (not the latest version). Unfortunately I bought a size too big I think and there is a lot of room in the liner especially around the heel and ankles. Do you think the Baruntse liner would help me out here? I just need something with more volume in the foam to fill the space between my foot and the shell or do you think it would be better just to buy a size smaller boot? A very expensive mistake if so!

Thanks a lot!


Dane said...

Hi Tony. A Baruntse likely won't be enough but a Intuition Denali should solve your problem. You'll have a much better/warm boot as a result. Good luck!

Anonymous said...

Hey Dane..
Just want to clarify, does the same fit go for the newer version of the 6000?
The boot is a full size bigger than my hikers from Scarpa but my big toe really pushes on the side.
Still a good idea to get the Baruntse liner in the same size? thanks!
(Denali in just a couple weeks!)

Dane said...

I've not tried on a new pair of the 6000.

Unknown said...

I have more heel lift in the 2016 Phantom 6000 size 46 vs the previous Phantom version 6000 size 46. Trying to fix that today with insoles, though it isn't looking promising. It appears Scarpa increased the heal volume on the new boots.

Also If you are doing the Baruntse liner mod on the older Phantoms, a size 46 Baruntse Liner was too big for my Size 46 Phantom 6000's. Probably needed a size 45 Baruntse liner.