the man in the mirror
When I really want to climb I don't take a HR monitor. But so much of my time outside is only training for something else more important to me. Which can make some days "less than fun". The HR monitor is generally my close companion. One I am constantly conversing with and referring to. If you are going to train, pays to heed the workout zone and the level of the effort for your desired effect. You simply need to pay attention to the details.
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
They came highly recommended but are hard to find as Dynafit imports so few to NA. I bought what was available knowing they might be too large. (they are) I first skied in them before cutting out the pre marked buckle slots. Nice pant but not all that impressive on the first run. After all they are not much more than a nice weight ski tight with a logo.
Previous to this trip I trimmed the premarked cut outs on the bottom of the legs. I am most impressed with the end result. The right pant really allows you to take advantage of the TLT boots in the back country. Dynafit's "Movement" pant is the "right" pant for the TLT. But easy enough to make your own as well. Again it is all in the details.
ski mode
walking mode
Home sewn pant mod that does has the same effect
While I am thinking about clothing. This one was a surprise and continues to impress me, "Cabella's E.C.W.C.S Thermal Zone® Polartec® Power Dry® " long johns. Cabellas' is not the first place I shop for gear. But neither is Costco and both have surprised me in the past. The E.C.W.C.S Thermal Zone® Polartec® Power Dry® is a base layer made up of several different weights of Polartec materials that are smartly sewn. In comparison to other long johns I have used they are warmer and a lot less bulky. Which makes them much easier to move in and just as important stay dry in. There is some really amazing technology and effort incorporated here. I have one pair right now but will be buying more. The bottoms are that much better than everything else I have used. Ease of movement at the knee and no boot top bunch. Too my surprise I noticed both improvments today when I went back to skiing in the typical long john bottom.
E.C.W.C.S Thermal Zone® Polartec® Power Dry® top.
Nice mouth full ;)
More detail stuff, If you want to run a HR monitor or a tech watch and more importantly want to pay attention to them for some reason be sure to put them in the right place. This one is buckled over my base layer and the other layers are blocked from covering the monitor. Silly stuff, but just more details.
The details? Do you have a foot problem? Even just a tiny one? Pays to remember them the night before and address it then. Better than landing in the parking lot for what ever adventure you have in mind and forgetting there is a problem. A two inch strip of tape can make the difference between a really fun day for me and enough additional pain to be really annoying. Another small detail.
Doesn't matter if it is Water or Rock. What you have seen here are some of my details. Just a small reminder to pay attention to your own details.
8 comments:
What Polar model is this please? - couldn't find it on the Polar website.
Polar RS-200SD. Not the best for what I was using it for here. But I like Polar a lot. Others don't.
The Foot Pod isn't required so even a simple one will do for skiing. This one I have used in Tris and a lot while running.
You have the max heart rate of a fit 33 year old. How old are you???
ha, ha! My actual measured max HR is 192 (on my road bike in a lab). Running and sking it will be higher by a few beats. 187 is just starting to get playfully painful on xc skis ;) The numbers mean little really. Everyone is different.
So how old does the 194 MHR show on your scale?
Nice upper for today, thanks!
I had to look it up myself.
http://www.active.com/fitness/calculators/heartrate.htm#
Says I should be 26 years old with a MHR of 194. So not very accurate.
Same here:
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/target-heart-rate/SM00083
The actual number isn't important. It is what you are actually capable of that is. That number (MHR) is sport specific and you really have to test for it to be accurate.
My MHR taken on a quick solo on the west butt of Denali from 11K up while in my 30s was 220+. Knowing so little about the subject of HR training/hydration at the time I was a little worry that I had over done it :) Which I had but it had nothing to do with my MHR. Took me a week to recover because of poor hydration and nutrition.
Dane -
That's pretty inspiring considering what your body's been through in the last six months.
I'm 40 and considered pretty active by most. My max measured HR is also 192. You're the man!
Ryan
Thanks Ryan, but it is just genetics. My resting HR on the other hand is (was) 42. Having it above 60 36 hrs after a big effort is what caught the cancer.
Freaked the nurses out though when I was in the mid 50s during most of my treatment. I was hitting 42 one moring early on which sent everyone in the ward rushing around :) Always good for a laugh to fook with the HR monitor at the hospital!
It is just been this week I am finally back into the mid 50s as a RHR. So I still have a huge amount of base work to do before I can call myself fit again.
As I said, they are just numbers. You really can't compare yours to anyone else in a meaningful fashion.
Just shared this discussion with my buddy Dave who did his first road bike ride with me last Sunday. And his first use of a HR monitor. He is 44 and had a max HR on our ride of 192. So he can tell Denise he has the body of a 28year old! She already knows he is a stud ;)
But with that result I'd bet his real MHR is past 200. As I said they are just numbers.
Post a Comment